|
|
| Author |
Message |
mrperfect Beginner
Joined: 09 Oct 2004 Posts: 4 Location: Very soon.. San Francisco, CA
|
Posted: Sat Oct 09, 2004 8:31 pm Post subject: netmrg-gatherer returns "Aborted" |
|
|
The web interface is working fine, I can successfully add devices and even cache interfaces and disks. However, no graphs are being generated. All logs are 0 bytes. When I try to run netmrg-grapherer, it just returns "Aborted" when run with any switch except for -h or -v.
Any help would be appreciated.
The system is running SuSE 9.1 on an Althon64. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
silfreed Site Admin
Joined: 19 Jan 2003 Posts: 394 Location: Shippensburg, PA, USA
|
Posted: Sat Oct 09, 2004 8:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
What was your installation method? Did you use one of the RPMs or compile it by hand?
-Doug |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mrperfect Beginner
Joined: 09 Oct 2004 Posts: 4 Location: Very soon.. San Francisco, CA
|
Posted: Sat Oct 09, 2004 9:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Source compile by hand.
Everything compiled ok. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
silfreed Site Admin
Joined: 19 Jan 2003 Posts: 394 Location: Shippensburg, PA, USA
|
Posted: Sun Oct 10, 2004 4:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
Have you tried running 'netmrg-gatherer -sm' or 'netmrg-gatherer -sa'? If either of those work - can you post the output?
-Doug |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mrperfect Beginner
Joined: 09 Oct 2004 Posts: 4 Location: Very soon.. San Francisco, CA
|
Posted: Sun Oct 10, 2004 7:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Both is "Aborted"... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
balleman Site Admin
Joined: 20 Jan 2003 Posts: 282
|
Posted: Sun Oct 10, 2004 2:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Try running netmrg-gatherer through gdb. Hopefully a backtrace will be helpful. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mrperfect Beginner
Joined: 09 Oct 2004 Posts: 4 Location: Very soon.. San Francisco, CA
|
Posted: Mon Oct 11, 2004 4:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Here's an output from gdb upon run:
Starting program: /usr/local/bin/netmrg-gatherer -sa
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread 182912645984 (LWP 15137)]
Program received signal SIGABRT, Aborted.
[Switching to Thread 182912645984 (LWP 15137)]
0x0000002a962d550d in raise () from /lib64/tls/libc.so.6
And a backtrace:
#0 0x0000002a962d550d in raise () from /lib64/tls/libc.so.6
#1 0x0000002a962d6ace in abort () from /lib64/tls/libc.so.6
#2 0x0000002a95bdafa6 in __cxxabiv1::__terminate () from /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.5
#3 0x0000002a95bdafd3 in std::terminate () from /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.5
#4 0x0000002a95bdb0c3 in __cxa_throw () from /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.5
#5 0x0000002a95b93e5b in std::__throw_out_of_range () from /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.5
#6 0x0000002a95bceb2c in std::string::replace () from /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.5
#7 0x0000000000426d8d in censor_message (message=Variable "message" is not available.
) at char_traits.h:143
#8 0x0000000000427c0d in debuglogger (component=1, level=32, info=0x0, message=@0x7fbfffee30) at basic_string.h:358
#9 0x000000000041bdce in run_netmrg () at stl_alloc.h:652
#10 0x000000000041d479 in main (argc=2, argv=0x7fbffff068) at netmrg.cpp:478
Has anyone successfully got this operating under 64-bit Linux? I'm willing to donate an account if you need a place for tweaking. Thanks. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
silfreed Site Admin
Joined: 19 Jan 2003 Posts: 394 Location: Shippensburg, PA, USA
|
Posted: Mon Oct 11, 2004 4:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| mrperfect wrote: |
| Has anyone successfully got this operating under 64-bit Linux? I'm willing to donate an account if you need a place for tweaking. Thanks. |
No, we haven't had a testing ground for any 64-bit boxes yet. If you would like to contact us off-list (you can find our email on the contact page) to setup a test account, that would be great.
-Doug |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
silfreed Site Admin
Joined: 19 Jan 2003 Posts: 394 Location: Shippensburg, PA, USA
|
Posted: Mon Oct 11, 2004 5:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Just in case anyone else is having this problem on x86-64 architectures, we've started bug#311 to address the issue.
-Doug |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
silfreed Site Admin
Joined: 19 Jan 2003 Posts: 394 Location: Shippensburg, PA, USA
|
Posted: Tue Oct 12, 2004 9:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
(Again) Just in case anyone is following this, we think we have this problem fixed. We've tested on 64-bit linux, but not others like FreeBSD. If anyone has hardware they'd be willing to test on, we'd appreciate it.
-Doug |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|